RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE).

RBOT.TO and LSMC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RBOT.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. LSMC.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. It was launched on Jul 3, 2020. Both RBOT.TO and LSMC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF	-9.39%	8.45%	13.12%	36.79%	-43.99%	8.06%	48.18%	28.46%	-26.43%	-1.50%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	2.81%	42.83%	70.18%	76.01%	-34.36%	26.57%	31.79%	31.07%	-2.60%	-1.76%

Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while LSMC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LSMC.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a -9.39% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 2.81% return.

RBOT.TO

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -15.42%
• YTD: -9.39%
• 6M: -7.09%
• 1Y: 14.13%
• 3Y*: 7.35%
• 5Y*: -2.01%
• 10Y*: —

LSMC.DE

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: -7.43%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 12.69%
• 1Y: 77.60%
• 3Y*: 49.55%
• 5Y*: 26.58%
• 10Y*: 23.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

RBOT.TO

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF

LSMC.DE

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOT.TO

RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 29
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 92
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBOT.TO	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	2.25	-1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.75	-1.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.37	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	4.88	-4.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	16.05	-13.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.TO and LSMC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBOT.TO	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	2.25	-1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	0.85	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.73	-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.TO and LSMC.DE is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF	0.15%	0.14%	0.85%	0.11%	0.52%	0.04%	0.17%	0.67%	0.15%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and LSMC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBOT.TO	LSMC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.86%	-39.77%	-17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.78%	-15.54%	-3.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.86%	-39.77%	-17.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.40%	-11.63%	-11.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.83%	-9.45%	-12.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.34%	4.71%	+0.63%

Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) is 7.64%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that RBOT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBOT.TO	LSMC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.64%	8.12%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.45%	22.02%	-5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.17%	34.38%	-7.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.21%	30.97%	-5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.76%	25.22%	-0.46%