RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOD.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOD.L returned 9.90%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for MOAT.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBOD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOAT.L.

Performance

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's -3.50% return.

RBOD.L

• 1D: -3.84%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 24.17%
• 6M: 22.05%
• 1Y: 39.94%
• 3Y*: 20.02%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: —

MOAT.L

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: -3.50%
• 6M: -3.97%
• 1Y: 6.98%
• 3Y*: 7.81%
• 5Y*: 3.00%
• 10Y*: 10.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	24.17%	17.05%	5.93%	39.67%	-34.54%	20.90%	39.66%	37.09%	-18.70%	6.18%
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	-3.50%	7.34%	11.12%	18.37%	-18.70%	25.53%	13.62%	33.78%	-1.64%	5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOD.L and MOAT.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017	0.77

The correlation between RBOD.L and MOAT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RBOD.L	MOAT.L
Technology	71.4%	24.3%
Industrials	26.2%	8.8%
Healthcare	1.5%	23.2%
Basic Materials	0.1%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	7.4%
Communication Services	-	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	18.1%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.4%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOD.L

RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MOAT.L

MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 18
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBOD.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	0.53	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	0.90	+1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.10	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	0.62	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	1.65	+7.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOD.L and MOAT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBOD.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	0.53	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.18	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.66	-0.12

Drawdowns

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and MOAT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBOD.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.47%	-32.78%	-11.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.38%	-11.86%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.00%	-21.84%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.47%	-27.06%	-17.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.05%	-5.84%	+1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-5.56%	-6.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	4.44%	+0.05%

Volatility

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) at 3.60%. This indicates that RBOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBOD.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.81%	3.60%	+5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.00%	9.65%	+9.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	13.79%	+9.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.79%	16.32%	+7.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	16.91%	+6.61%

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOD.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while MOAT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF	0.28%	0.34%	0.36%	0.45%	0.56%	0.32%	0.34%	0.79%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBOD.L and MOAT.L in my portfolio?

RBOD.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBOD.L or MOAT.L?

On fees, RBOD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBOD.L or MOAT.L?

RBOD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.

What is the main difference between RBOD.L and MOAT.L?

RBOD.L is categorized as Robotics, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.