MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE).
MOAT.L and AMEM.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOAT.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Oct 16, 2015. AMEM.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010. Both MOAT.L and AMEM.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | -8.00% | 7.34% | 11.12% | 18.37% | -18.70% | 25.53% | 13.62% | 33.80% | -2.10% | 23.05% |
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR | 4.87% | 34.69% | 7.20% | 8.57% | -18.53% | -4.25% | 16.68% | 18.94% | -15.38% | 37.83% |
Different Trading Currencies
MOAT.L is traded in USD, while AMEM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AMEM.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT.L achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than AMEM.DE's 4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MOAT.L has outperformed AMEM.DE with an annualized return of 10.78%, while AMEM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.14% annualized return.
MOAT.L
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -5.21%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
AMEM.DE
- 1D
- 3.82%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 35.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT.L
AMEM.DE
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOAT.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 1.80 | -1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | 2.36 | -1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.34 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 2.74 | -2.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 10.13 | -8.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOAT.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 1.80 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.23 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.21 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT.L and AMEM.DE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MOAT.L nor AMEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT.L drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum AMEM.DE drawdown of -39.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT.L and AMEM.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.78% | -35.87% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -13.55% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.06% | -23.53% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.78% | -31.93% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -7.57% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -10.39% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.10% | +0.30% |
Volatility
MOAT.L vs. AMEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) is 4.25%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that MOAT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT.L | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 8.12% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 13.85% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.99% | 19.42% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 18.22% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 19.32% | -2.37% |