PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RBOD.L is traded in USD, while GXLK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOD.L achieves a 29.97% return, which is significantly higher than GXLK.L's 16.72% return.


RBOD.L

1D
0.36%
1M
1.73%
YTD
29.97%
6M
29.85%
1Y
43.70%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*

GXLK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
16.72%
6M
16.48%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
27.07%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
29.97%17.05%5.93%39.67%-34.54%20.90%39.66%37.09%-18.70%6.18%
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
16.72%24.63%22.65%56.14%-47.08%33.00%47.77%55.62%-7.37%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOD.L and GXLK.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.67

The correlation between RBOD.L and GXLK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOD.L
RBOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBOD.LGXLK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.25

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

6.42

+3.16

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOD.L and GXLK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, smaller than the maximum GXLK.L drawdown of -51.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOD.L and GXLK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBOD.LGXLK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-51.15%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.38%

-16.71%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.00%

-27.01%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.47%

-51.15%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-8.07%

+4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.98%

-10.82%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

5.86%

-1.31%

Volatility

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) at 8.72%. This indicates that RBOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXLK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBOD.LGXLK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

8.72%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

16.15%

+4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.22%

21.08%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

25.76%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.59%

26.25%

-2.66%

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLK.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBOD.L vs. GXLK.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while GXLK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBOD.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.30%0.34%0.36%0.45%0.56%0.32%0.34%0.79%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBOD.L and GXLK.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RBOD.L.

RBOD.L is categorized as Robotics, while GXLK.L is Technology Equities. RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RBOD.L and 0.15% for GXLK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBOD.L and GXLK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer