GXLK.L vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
GXLK.L and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXLK.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both GXLK.L and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GXLK.L or XLK.
Key characteristics
| GXLK.L | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.94% | 22.90% |
| 1Y Return | 25.30% | 30.23% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.66 | 1.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.19 | 2.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.14 | 1.93 |
| Martin Ratio | 2.13 | 6.69 |
| Ulcer Index | 11.32% | 4.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 36.56% | 21.64% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.13% | -82.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.24% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLK.L and XLK is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GXLK.L vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GXLK.L achieves a 19.94% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 22.90% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXLK.L vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLK.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GXLK.L vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GXLK.L vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
GXLK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLK.L SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
GXLK.L vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLK.L drawdown since its inception was -21.13%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLK.L and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GXLK.L vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) is 4.88%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that GXLK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.