RBLY vs. YMAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RBLY (YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both exchange-traded funds - RBLY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while YMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RBLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.

Performance

RBLY vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -45.56% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's 3.80% return.

RBLY

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -8.47%
• YTD: -45.56%
• 6M: -50.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YMAG

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 4.38%
• 1Y: 27.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLY vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	-45.56%	-24.82%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	3.80%	12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and YMAG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

RBLY vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG

YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 43
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLY vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBLY	YMAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.25	1.19	-2.44

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and YMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLY	YMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	-25.96%	-39.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.42%	-2.71%	-62.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.05%	-4.52%	-28.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RBLY	YMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.41%	16.19%	+36.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.41%	20.88%	+31.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.41%	20.88%	+31.53%

RBLY vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLY vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.58%, more than YMAG's 52.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	127.58%	36.84%	0.00%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	52.16%	52.27%	35.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLY and YMAG in my portfolio?

RBLY and YMAG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBLY or YMAG?

On fees, RBLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBLY or YMAG?

RBLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBLY or YMAG?

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 127.58%, compared with 52.16% for YMAG.

What is the main difference between RBLY and YMAG?

RBLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while YMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 1.28% for YMAG.