RBLX vs. CW
RBLX (Roblox Corporation) and CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) are both stocks. RBLX operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, RBLX returned -14.14%/yr vs 43.15%/yr for CW. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBLX vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLX achieves a -46.55% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 37.55% return.
RBLX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 3.22%
- YTD
- -46.55%
- 6M
- -51.07%
- 1Y
- -54.46%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CW
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 37.55%
- 6M
- 38.99%
- 1Y
- 60.13%
- 3Y*
- 63.08%
- 5Y*
- 43.15%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
RBLX vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBLX Roblox Corporation | -46.55% | 40.04% | 26.55% | 60.65% | -72.41% | 59.94% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 37.55% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLX and CW is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
RBLX:
$30.82B
CW:
$28.09B
RBLX:
-$1.57
CW:
$13.64
RBLX:
5.71
CW:
7.88
RBLX:
71.35
CW:
10.67
RBLX:
$5.30B
CW:
$3.61B
RBLX:
$4.16B
CW:
$1.34B
RBLX:
-$944.43M
CW:
$745.31M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLX vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank
RBLX
CW
RBLX vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roblox Corporation (RBLX) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBLX | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.31 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 4.66 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 13.53 | -14.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBLX vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLX drawdown since its inception was -82.79%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLX and CW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLX | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.79% | -59.19% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.82% | -12.97% | -57.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.82% | -27.21% | -43.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.79% | -27.21% | -55.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.41% | 0.00% | -69.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.01% | -13.89% | -39.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.76% | 4.46% | +37.30% |
Volatility
RBLX vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
Roblox Corporation (RBLX) has a higher volatility of 16.92% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 10.40%. This indicates that RBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLX | CW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.92% | 10.40% | +6.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.88% | 26.00% | +21.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.45% | 32.95% | +26.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.18% | 27.89% | +41.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.06% | 30.31% | +39.75% |
Dividends
RBLX vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
RBLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
RBLX Roblox Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RBLX vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roblox Corporation and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBLX vs. CW - Profitability Comparison
RBLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
RBLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported an operating income of -294.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.4%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
RBLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of -17.1%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLX and CW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBLX has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to CW (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLX dropped -82.79% vs CW's -59.19%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBLX and CW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer