PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLU vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLU achieves a -76.56% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 13.33% return.


RBLU

1D
-0.87%
1M
-8.69%
YTD
-76.56%
6M
-76.79%
1Y
-88.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUU

1D
-2.91%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
13.33%
6M
10.95%
1Y
43.00%
3Y*
34.33%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*
24.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RBLU
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF
-76.56%23.90%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
13.33%29.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLU and SPUU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLU
RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBLUSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.30

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

2.38

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

10.11

-11.47

RBLU vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLU Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLU and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBLU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -94.76%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLUSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.76%

-59.35%

-35.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.76%

-18.19%

-76.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.45%

-6.62%

-86.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.77%

-9.48%

-35.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.26%

4.27%

+60.99%

Volatility

RBLU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a higher volatility of 37.54% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 9.70%. This indicates that RBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLUSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.54%

9.70%

+27.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.64%

19.93%

+82.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

122.97%

25.22%

+97.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.40%

33.67%

+84.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.40%

35.81%

+82.59%

RBLU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than SPUU's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBLU
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF
5.52%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.42%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLU and SPUU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLU has higher volatility (37.54%) compared to SPUU (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLU dropped -94.76% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 43.00% vs -88.85% for RBLU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 43.00% return vs -88.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 1.42% for SPUU.

RBLU tracks Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLU and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer