PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBIL vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBIL vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly higher than PBTP's 1.44% return.


RBIL

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.29%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBTP

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.50%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBIL vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBIL and PBTP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBIL vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBIL vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBILPBTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.15

1.46

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.33

4.73

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.56

16.59

+23.96

RBIL vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBIL Sharpe Ratio is 4.40, which is higher than the PBTP Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBIL and PBTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBIL vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum PBTP drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and PBTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBILPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-5.44%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.56%

-0.76%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.71%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.07%

-0.75%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

0.22%

-0.12%

Volatility

RBIL vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.36%, while Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBILPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.63%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.85%

1.17%

-0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94%

1.62%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.07%

2.85%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.07%

2.64%

-1.57%

RBIL vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RBIL vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, less than PBTP's 4.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
4.82%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.39%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBIL and PBTP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBTP has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBIL dropped -0.56% vs PBTP's -5.44%.

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.11% vs 3.57% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.11% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 4.39% for RBIL.

RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: F/m and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 0.07% for PBTP.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBIL and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer