RBIL vs. DDM
RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) and DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while DDM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RBIL returned 3.92% vs 42.83% for DDM. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. RBIL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DDM.
Performance
RBIL vs. DDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than DDM's 19.12% return.
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
DDM
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 42.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.46M | $13.17M | $12.37M | |
| $1.11M | $1.90M | $2.32M |
RBIL vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.68% | 2.85% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 19.12% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBIL and DDM is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBIL vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank
RBIL
DDM
RBIL vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBIL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 1.29 | +0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.00 | 2.23 | +4.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.60 | 8.20 | +20.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBIL vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.56%, smaller than the maximum DDM drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and DDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBIL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -81.70% | +81.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.56% | -19.31% | +18.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | 0.00% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -17.20% | +17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.14% | 5.24% | -5.10% |
Volatility
RBIL vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.30%, while ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBIL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 7.60% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.90% | 19.83% | -18.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96% | 25.07% | -24.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 29.64% | -28.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.06% | 34.77% | -33.71% |
RBIL vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DDM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBIL vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison
RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than DDM's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.91% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBIL and DDM have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDM has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBIL dropped -0.56% vs DDM's -81.70%.
On 1-year performance, DDM leads with 42.83% vs 3.92% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DDM has performed better with a 42.83% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.91% for DDM.
RBIL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DDM is Leveraged Equities. RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index, while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: F/m and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for RBIL and 0.95% for DDM.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBIL and DDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer