PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMMVY vs. 0151.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR (WMMVY) and Want Want China (0151.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WMMVY is traded in USD, while 0151.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0151.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMMVY achieves a -6.77% return, which is significantly higher than 0151.HK's -27.71% return. Over the past 10 years, WMMVY has outperformed 0151.HK with an annualized return of 5.53%, while 0151.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 0.26% annualized return.


WMMVY

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-8.44%
YTD
-6.77%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
-8.71%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
5.53%
ALL TIME*
4.47%

0151.HK

1D
-1.73%
1M
-0.29%
6M
-28.65%
YTD
-27.71%
1Y
-38.59%
3Y*
-11.71%
5Y*
-4.20%
10Y*
0.26%
ALL TIME*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.25M$6.67M$5.56M
$4.23M$5.74M$4.29M

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMMVY
Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR
-6.77%21.40%-35.04%24.21%-3.70%35.33%1.62%15.94%6.58%41.89%
0151.HK
Want Want China
-27.71%4.55%2.69%-6.73%-20.70%30.95%-17.91%39.55%-13.72%34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WMMVY and 0151.HK is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WMMVY
WMMVY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WMMVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMMVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMMVY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
WMMVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMMVY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

0151.HK
0151.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
0151.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0151.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
0151.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
0151.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
0151.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR (WMMVY) and Want Want China (0151.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMMVY0151.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.75

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.83

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

-1.69

+1.85

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMMVY Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the 0151.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMMVY and 0151.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMMVY drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum 0151.HK drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMMVY and 0151.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMMVY0151.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-62.43%

+22.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.18%

-47.22%

+25.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.68%

-47.22%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-53.99%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.68%

-53.99%

+14.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.51%

-59.03%

+31.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-31.63%

+19.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.10%

22.93%

-14.83%

Volatility

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR (WMMVY) is 6.43%, while Want Want China (0151.HK) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that WMMVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0151.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMMVY0151.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

7.87%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

23.33%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.85%

28.43%

-3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.85%

28.19%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.65%

29.11%

+1.54%

Dividends

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Dividend Comparison

WMMVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than 0151.HK's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0151.HK
Want Want China
4.71%3.43%5.64%3.49%9.28%2.49%5.76%3.80%3.83%2.56%2.86%2.44%
WMMVY
Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR
3.15%2.93%3.99%3.13%2.11%2.10%3.08%3.12%2.28%3.60%4.71%0.00%

Financials

WMMVY vs. 0151.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wal Mart de Mexico SAB de CV ADR and Want Want China. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. WMMVY values in USD, 0151.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


WMMVY and 0151.HK have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMMVY and 0151.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer