RBCGX vs. AMRGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX).
RBCGX is managed by Reynolds. It was launched on Aug 12, 1988. AMRGX is managed by American Growth. It was launched on Jul 31, 1958.
Performance
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund | -9.03% | 14.42% | 33.73% | 28.83% | -30.06% | -3.63% | 43.98% | 25.52% | -3.81% | 24.73% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | -1.31% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBCGX achieves a -9.03% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's -1.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RBCGX having a 10.16% annualized return and AMRGX not far ahead at 10.41%.
RBCGX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.03%
- 6M
- -11.29%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
AMRGX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBCGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBCGX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
RBCGX
AMRGX
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBCGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.12 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.99 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 2.37 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBCGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.62 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.34 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.10 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBCGX and AMRGX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
RBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.34%, more than AMRGX's 18.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund | 18.34% | 16.69% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 6.27% | 7.33% | 9.93% | 4.67% | 21.03% | 8.16% | 9.06% | 6.53% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 18.06% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBCGX drawdown since its inception was -77.12%, roughly equal to the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCGX and AMRGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBCGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.12% | -80.32% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -13.98% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.47% | -35.42% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.47% | -35.42% | -10.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.55% | -13.98% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -40.45% | +15.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 5.82% | -0.82% |
Volatility
RBCGX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) is 3.40%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that RBCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBCGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 6.18% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 23.49% | -13.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 28.26% | -12.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 21.84% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 21.30% | -0.81% |