RBBAX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Income Builder Fund (RBBAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
RBBAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Feb 15, 2006. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBBAX Columbia Income Builder Fund | -0.23% | 11.15% | 4.96% | 9.02% | -12.87% | 6.08% | 10.15% | 13.77% | -2.66% | 7.51% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBBAX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, RBBAX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.
RBBAX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBBAX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBBAX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
RBBAX
CTCAX
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Income Builder Fund (RBBAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBBAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.02 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 1.57 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.67 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 5.92 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBBAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.02 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.82 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.70 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBBAX and CTCAX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
RBBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, which matches CTCAX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBBAX Columbia Income Builder Fund | 3.67% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.82% | 4.94% | 4.73% | 4.07% | 3.90% | 3.92% | 3.47% | 3.01% | 6.84% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBBAX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBBAX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBBAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -61.04% | +37.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -14.43% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -39.55% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.06% | -39.55% | +21.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -14.43% | +10.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -10.75% | +7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 4.07% | -3.03% |
Volatility
RBBAX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Income Builder Fund (RBBAX) is 2.05%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that RBBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBBAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.05% | 7.45% | -5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.19% | 16.24% | -13.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.55% | 27.00% | -21.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.25% | 25.81% | -19.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.80% | 24.66% | -18.86% |