RBA vs. TWLO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RBA (Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated) and TWLO (Twilio Inc.) are both stocks. RBA operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while TWLO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, RBA returned 14.01%/yr vs -5.84%/yr for TWLO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RBA vs. TWLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) and Twilio Inc. (TWLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBA achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than TWLO's 61.21% return.

RBA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 7.88%
• 1Y: 0.76%
• 3Y*: 25.63%
• 5Y*: 14.01%
• 10Y*: 14.36%

TWLO

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 25.07%
• YTD: 61.21%
• 6M: 76.70%
• 1Y: 91.72%
• 3Y*: 50.59%
• 5Y*: -5.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBA vs. TWLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated	2.50%	15.37%	36.75%	20.26%	-3.92%	-10.66%	64.64%	33.94%	11.56%	-9.87%
TWLO Twilio Inc.	61.21%	31.61%	42.45%	54.96%	-81.41%	-22.20%	244.42%	10.06%	278.39%	-18.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RBA and TWLO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2016	0.22

The correlation between RBA and TWLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RBA : $19.66B TWLO : $36.17B
EPS RBA : $2.41 TWLO : $0.66
PE Ratio RBA : 43.45 TWLO : 346.85
PS Ratio RBA : 4.14 TWLO : 6.80
PB Ratio RBA : 3.50 TWLO : 4.65
Total Revenue (TTM) RBA : $4.74B TWLO : $5.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) RBA : $1.58B TWLO : $2.59B
EBITDA (TTM) RBA : $1.20B TWLO : $304.06M

Return for Risk

RBA vs. TWLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBA

RBA Risk / Return Rank: 38
RBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
RBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
RBA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
RBA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

TWLO

TWLO Risk / Return Rank: 81
TWLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TWLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TWLO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TWLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TWLO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBA vs. TWLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) and Twilio Inc. (TWLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBA	TWLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	1.54	-1.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	2.30	-2.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.31	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	3.13	-3.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.06	7.15	-7.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBA vs. TWLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the TWLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBA and TWLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBA	TWLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	1.54	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	-0.10	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.38	+0.10

Drawdowns

RBA vs. TWLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBA drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, smaller than the maximum TWLO drawdown of -90.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBA and TWLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBA	TWLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.54%	-90.36%	+36.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.75%	-30.34%	+9.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.75%	-45.17%	+24.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.71%	-89.57%	+57.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.73%	-48.30%	+36.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.54%	-49.52%	+33.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.23%	13.26%	-2.03%

Volatility

RBA vs. TWLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) is 5.41%, while Twilio Inc. (TWLO) has a volatility of 20.76%. This indicates that RBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBA	TWLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	20.76%	-15.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.44%	42.40%	-20.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.34%	59.85%	-34.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.37%	59.31%	-29.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.64%	60.76%	-30.12%

Dividends

RBA vs. TWLO - Dividend Comparison

RBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while TWLO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated	1.18%	1.17%	1.24%	3.23%	1.80%	1.54%	1.21%	1.77%	2.14%	2.27%	1.94%	2.49%
TWLO Twilio Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

RBA vs. TWLO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated and Twilio Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TWLO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a gross profit of 684.24M and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.6%.

RBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported an operating income of 217.50M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

TWLO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported an operating income of 107.67M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

RBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported a net income of 135.50M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.

TWLO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Twilio Inc. reported a net income of 90.14M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBA and TWLO in my portfolio?

RBA and TWLO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBA or TWLO?

TWLO has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to RBA (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBA dropped -53.54% vs TWLO's -90.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TWLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.