RBA vs. CSU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO).
Performance
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated | -6.58% | 15.37% | 36.75% | 20.26% | -3.92% | -10.66% | 64.64% | 33.94% | 11.56% | -9.87% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | -26.94% | -22.06% | 24.78% | 62.54% | -15.73% | 43.41% | 44.16% | 55.92% | 6.36% | 34.51% |
Different Trading Currencies
RBA is traded in USD, while CSU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CSU.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
RBA:
$17.95B
CSU.TO:
CA$51.77B
RBA:
$2.29
CSU.TO:
CA$24.24
RBA:
41.84
CSU.TO:
100.75
RBA:
1.19
CSU.TO:
5.29
RBA:
3.90
CSU.TO:
4.43
RBA:
3.22
CSU.TO:
14.51
RBA:
$4.59B
CSU.TO:
CA$11.67B
RBA:
$1.56B
CSU.TO:
CA$5.50B
RBA:
$1.20B
CSU.TO:
CA$2.79B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBA achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly higher than CSU.TO's -28.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RBA has underperformed CSU.TO with an annualized return of 15.65%, while CSU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.93% annualized return.
RBA
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- -6.58%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -3.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
CSU.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -28.63%
- 6M
- -36.73%
- 1Y
- -45.77%
- 3Y*
- -2.83%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 16.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBA vs. CSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RBA
CSU.TO
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBA | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | -1.17 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.01 | -1.79 | +1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.79 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | -0.83 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | -1.55 | +1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBA | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | -1.17 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.15 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.60 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.17 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBA and CSU.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
RBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than CSU.TO's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated | 1.27% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 3.23% | 1.80% | 1.54% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.27% | 1.94% | 2.49% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.30% | 2.53% | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBA drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CSU.TO drawdown of -55.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBA and CSU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBA | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -56.38% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.75% | -56.38% | +35.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.71% | -56.38% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.97% | -56.38% | +17.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.55% | -52.80% | +33.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.56% | -6.44% | -9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 30.12% | -20.16% |
Volatility
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) is 9.37%, while Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that RBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBA | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 15.67% | -6.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.19% | 30.72% | -8.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.23% | 39.30% | -12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 28.87% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.64% | 28.22% | +2.42% |
Financials
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBA vs. CSU.TO - Profitability Comparison
RBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CSU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 862.05M and revenue of 3.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.
RBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported an operating income of 177.00M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.
CSU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 556.42M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
RBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported a net income of 109.70M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
CSU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 111.69M and revenue of 3.23B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.