RBA vs. CPRT
RBA (Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated) and CPRT (Copart, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Business Services industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, RBA returned 14.89%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for CPRT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBA vs. CPRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBA achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly higher than CPRT's -24.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RBA has underperformed CPRT with an annualized return of 14.89%, while CPRT has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.
RBA
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 5.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
CPRT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -12.40%
- YTD
- -24.39%
- 6M
- -24.39%
- 1Y
- -37.97%
- 3Y*
- -12.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.06%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
RBA vs. CPRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated | 6.02% | 15.37% | 36.75% | 20.26% | -3.92% | -10.66% | 64.64% | 33.94% | 11.56% | -9.87% |
CPRT Copart, Inc. | -24.39% | -31.78% | 17.12% | 60.95% | -19.68% | 19.15% | 39.93% | 90.33% | 10.63% | 55.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBA and CPRT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1998 | 0.26 |
The correlation between RBA and CPRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RBA:
$20.34B
CPRT:
$28.57B
RBA:
$2.41
CPRT:
$1.59
RBA:
44.95
CPRT:
18.56
RBA:
1.27
CPRT:
1.43
RBA:
4.29
CPRT:
6.22
RBA:
3.62
CPRT:
3.26
RBA:
$4.74B
CPRT:
$4.64B
RBA:
$1.58B
CPRT:
$2.11B
RBA:
$1.20B
CPRT:
$2.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBA vs. CPRT — Risk / Return Rank
RBA
CPRT
RBA vs. CPRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) and Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBA | CPRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.72 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | -0.93 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | -1.66 | +2.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBA vs. CPRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBA drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, smaller than the maximum CPRT drawdown of -72.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBA and CPRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBA | CPRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -72.49% | +18.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.75% | -41.00% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.75% | -53.82% | +33.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.71% | -53.82% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.97% | -53.82% | +14.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -53.63% | +44.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.53% | -16.60% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.47% | 22.84% | -11.37% |
Volatility
RBA vs. CPRT - Volatility Comparison
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA) and Copart, Inc. (CPRT) have volatilities of 7.98% and 8.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBA | CPRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.98% | 8.32% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.05% | 19.43% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.20% | 24.18% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.49% | 26.04% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.66% | 27.48% | +3.18% |
Dividends
RBA vs. CPRT - Dividend Comparison
RBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while CPRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBA Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated | 1.14% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 3.23% | 1.80% | 1.54% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 2.27% | 1.94% | 2.49% |
Financials
RBA vs. CPRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated and Copart, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RBA vs. CPRT - Profitability Comparison
RBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CPRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.
RBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported an operating income of 217.50M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
CPRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported an operating income of 464.28M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
RBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated reported a net income of 135.50M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
CPRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported a net income of 402.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RBA and CPRT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPRT has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to RBA (7.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBA dropped -53.54% vs CPRT's -72.49%.
RBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBA and CPRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer