PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RB vs. PMJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RB vs. PMJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than PMJL's 2.63% return.


RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMJL

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. PMJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RB and PMJL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RB vs. PMJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July (PMJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RB vs. PMJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBPMJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.15

3.23

-0.09

Drawdowns

RB vs. PMJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, which is greater than PMJL's maximum drawdown of -1.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and PMJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBPMJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-1.49%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.02%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-0.12%

-0.29%

Volatility

RB vs. PMJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBPMJLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

2.06%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

2.06%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

2.06%

+4.15%

RB vs. PMJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PMJL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RB vs. PMJL - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while PMJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RB and PMJL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PMJL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PMJL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for PMJL.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.50% for PMJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RB and PMJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer