RB vs. PBQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. RB is passively managed, while PBQQ is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBQQ.

Performance

RB vs. PBQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RB having a 8.33% return and PBQQ slightly lower at 8.21%.

RB

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 6M: 8.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBQQ

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 8.21%
• 6M: 8.11%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. PBQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	8.33%	10.85%
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	8.21%	8.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RB and PBQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

RB vs. PBQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PBQQ

PBQQ Risk / Return Rank: 88
PBQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PBQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PBQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PBQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PBQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RB vs. PBQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RB	PBQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.85	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.52	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.08	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.12	—

Drawdowns

RB vs. PBQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -2.09%, smaller than the maximum PBQQ drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and PBQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RB	PBQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-12.92%	+10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-1.02%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-1.24%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RB	PBQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.55%	7.32%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.55%	11.79%	-5.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.55%	11.79%	-5.24%

RB vs. PBQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PBQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RB vs. PBQQ - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than PBQQ's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	1.97%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RB and PBQQ in my portfolio?

RB and PBQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RB or PBQQ?

On fees, PBQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RB or PBQQ?

PBQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RB or PBQQ?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.01% for PBQQ.

What is the main difference between RB and PBQQ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.50% for PBQQ.