RB vs. ALIL
RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and ALIL (Argent Focused Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000, while ALIL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Argent. RB is passively managed, while ALIL is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for ALIL.
Performance
RB vs. ALIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than ALIL's 7.70% return.
RB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALIL
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RB vs. ALIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.76% | 10.58% |
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 7.70% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between RB and ALIL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RB vs. ALIL — Risk / Return Rank
RB
ALIL
RB vs. ALIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Argent Focused Small Cap ETF (ALIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RB | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.15 | 0.69 | +2.45 |
Drawdowns
RB vs. ALIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum ALIL drawdown of -12.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and ALIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RB | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -12.60% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.32% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -3.18% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility
RB vs. ALIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RB | ALIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.21% | 18.50% | -12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 18.92% | -12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 18.92% | -12.71% |
RB vs. ALIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than ALIL's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
RB vs. ALIL - Dividend Comparison
RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than ALIL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ALIL Argent Focused Small Cap ETF | 0.44% | 0.47% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RB and ALIL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ALIL.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.44% for ALIL.
RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ALIL is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Argent. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.74% for ALIL.
Find the right allocation for RB and ALIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer