RAYS vs. PBD
RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) and PBD (Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - RAYS tracks the Solactive Solar Index while PBD tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. Both are passively managed. RAYS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PBD.
Performance
RAYS vs. PBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBD
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 6.10%
- YTD
- 38.50%
- 6M
- 39.82%
- 1Y
- 92.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- -3.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
RAYS vs. PBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 23.61% |
RAYS vs. PBD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RAYS
PBD
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
RAYS
PBD
Industrials
RAYS
PBD
Utilities
RAYS
PBD
Consumer Cyclical
RAYS
PBD
Basic Materials
RAYS
PBD
Communication Services
RAYS
-
PBD
-
Consumer Defensive
RAYS
-
PBD
Energy
RAYS
-
PBD
Financial Services
RAYS
-
PBD
Healthcare
RAYS
-
PBD
-
Real Estate
RAYS
-
PBD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAYS vs. PBD — Risk / Return Rank
RAYS
PBD
RAYS vs. PBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAYS | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.03 | — |
Drawdowns
RAYS vs. PBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PBD drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS and PBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAYS | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -78.60% | +78.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -52.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -39.02% | +39.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -53.40% | +53.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility
RAYS vs. PBD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAYS | PBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 23.41% | -23.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 28.37% | -28.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 27.26% | -27.26% |
RAYS vs. PBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PBD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAYS vs. PBD - Dividend Comparison
RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBD Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.63% | 2.71% | 1.81% | 2.85% | 2.98% | 0.67% | 0.48% | 1.83% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.04% | 1.24% |
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, RAYS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAYS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBD.
PBD has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index, while PBD tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RAYS and 0.75% for PBD.
Find the right allocation for RAYS and PBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer