PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAPZX vs. CSUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAPZX achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 8.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RAPZX has underperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.24% annualized return.


RAPZX

1D
-0.32%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
13.17%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
6.77%

CSUAX

1D
-1.25%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
8.11%
6M
7.64%
1Y
14.89%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
13.17%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
8.11%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%24.26%-5.83%17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RAPZX and CSUAX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.74

The correlation between RAPZX and CSUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAPZX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAPZXCSUAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.59

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

2.31

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.75

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.25

9.28

+1.98

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAPZX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAPZXCSUAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.59

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.49

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.55

-0.19

Drawdowns

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAPZX drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAPZX and CSUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAPZXCSUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.69%

-52.20%

+21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-5.99%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.84%

-14.95%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-20.45%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.69%

-35.05%

+4.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-4.60%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-8.44%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.77%

-0.18%

Volatility

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) is 2.09%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that RAPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAPZXCSUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

2.80%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

7.81%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

9.63%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.83%

12.98%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.78%

14.92%

-2.14%

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAPZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAPZX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

RAPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than CSUAX's 7.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
7.48%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.28%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAPZX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSUAX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to RAPZX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAPZX dropped -30.69% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

RAPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAPZX and CSUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer