RAPZX vs. FFAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX).
RAPZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Jan 30, 2012. FFAAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Aug 14, 2003.
Performance
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAPZX Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc | 10.26% | 11.96% | 4.35% | 3.88% | -2.05% | 23.51% | -0.84% | 17.77% | -8.44% | 6.51% |
FFAAX Franklin Global Allocation Fund | -3.10% | 16.24% | 13.12% | 13.24% | -11.61% | 12.01% | 1.70% | 18.06% | -9.60% | 11.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAPZX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than FFAAX's -3.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RAPZX having a 7.09% annualized return and FFAAX not far behind at 7.00%.
RAPZX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
FFAAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -3.10%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 12.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAPZX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FFAAX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RAPZX vs. FFAAX — Risk / Return Rank
RAPZX
FFAAX
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAPZX | FFAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.19 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.76 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 1.48 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 6.91 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAPZX | FFAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.19 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.51 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between RAPZX and FFAAX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Dividend Comparison
RAPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FFAAX's 5.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAPZX Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc | 1.31% | 1.44% | 3.20% | 2.71% | 3.08% | 9.61% | 1.71% | 2.85% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 2.83% | 2.00% |
FFAAX Franklin Global Allocation Fund | 5.28% | 5.12% | 1.33% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 0.90% | 7.65% | 3.24% | 4.24% | 3.19% | 2.40% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAPZX drawdown since its inception was -30.69%, smaller than the maximum FFAAX drawdown of -52.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAPZX and FFAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAPZX | FFAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -52.89% | +22.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -7.75% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -18.17% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.69% | -30.09% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -6.64% | +3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -7.18% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.66% | +0.24% |
Volatility
RAPZX vs. FFAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) is 2.90%, while Franklin Global Allocation Fund (FFAAX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that RAPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RAPZX | FFAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 3.50% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 6.44% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 10.71% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 9.94% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 11.47% | +1.34% |