PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAND vs. ICMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RAND vs. ICMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rand Capital Corporation (RAND) and Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAND achieves a -7.44% return, which is significantly higher than ICMB's -71.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RAND has outperformed ICMB with an annualized return of 2.86%, while ICMB has yielded a comparatively lower -11.13% annualized return.


RAND

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.00%
6M
-6.49%
YTD
-7.44%
1Y
-38.17%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
2.86%
ALL TIME*
-1.32%

ICMB

1D
-1.18%
1M
-20.95%
6M
-74.16%
YTD
-71.48%
1Y
-70.11%
3Y*
-32.92%
5Y*
-24.18%
10Y*
-11.13%
ALL TIME*
-10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.35K$49.37K$104.10K
$23.55K$19.46K$30.02K

RAND vs. ICMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RAND
Rand Capital Corporation
-7.44%-34.86%91.43%7.45%-17.05%-0.95%69.87%7.20%-17.22%-4.43%
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
-71.48%5.92%0.74%19.01%-18.96%15.99%-16.38%23.01%-13.98%-2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RAND and ICMB is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RAND:

$30.29M

ICMB:

$11.11M

EPS

RAND:

-$2.81

ICMB:

-$0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

RAND:

-$3.23M

ICMB:

$6.51M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RAND:

-$4.74M

ICMB:

$729.57K

EBITDA (TTM)

RAND:

-$6.47M

ICMB:

-$9.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAND vs. ICMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAND
RAND Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RAND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAND Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAND Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RAND Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAND Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ICMB
ICMB Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ICMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMB Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAND vs. ICMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rand Capital Corporation (RAND) and Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RANDICMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.69

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.93

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-2.00

+0.67

RAND vs. ICMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAND Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the ICMB Sharpe Ratio of -1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAND and ICMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAND vs. ICMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAND drawdown since its inception was -89.66%, which is greater than ICMB's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAND and ICMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RANDICMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.66%

-80.34%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.44%

-75.55%

+36.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.11%

-75.55%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.11%

-76.50%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.11%

-80.34%

+20.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.28%

-76.12%

+16.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.66%

-19.94%

-47.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.39%

35.27%

-5.88%

Volatility

RAND vs. ICMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rand Capital Corporation (RAND) is 5.09%, while Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc. (ICMB) has a volatility of 18.67%. This indicates that RAND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RANDICMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

18.67%

-13.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.94%

56.11%

-31.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.44%

57.52%

-14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.91%

41.16%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.36%

45.33%

+1.03%

Dividends

RAND vs. ICMB - Dividend Comparison

RAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.18%, less than ICMB's 36.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.
36.36%19.26%17.82%17.72%17.02%12.73%15.93%14.93%16.00%12.27%15.12%18.14%
RAND
Rand Capital Corporation
17.18%15.15%26.13%10.24%6.23%2.59%90.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RAND vs. ICMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rand Capital Corporation and Investcorp Credit Management BDC, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RAND and ICMB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICMB has higher volatility (18.67%) compared to RAND (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAND dropped -89.66% vs ICMB's -80.34%.

RAND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAND and ICMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer