PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAMP vs. SSRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RAMP vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RAMP having a 28.98% return and SSRM slightly higher at 30.38%.


RAMP

1D
0.26%
1M
0.69%
6M
35.77%
YTD
28.98%
1Y
17.79%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*

SSRM

1D
-1.96%
1M
8.59%
6M
29.85%
YTD
30.38%
1Y
125.75%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAMP vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
28.98%-3.29%-19.83%61.60%-51.12%-34.49%52.26%24.44%-4.69%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
30.38%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%-10.90%4.41%59.31%16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RAMP and SSRM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RAMP:

$2.30B

SSRM:

$5.93B

EPS

RAMP:

$1.46

SSRM:

$3.26

PE Ratio

RAMP:

25.90

SSRM:

8.76

PEG Ratio

RAMP:

0.02

SSRM:

0.14

PS Ratio

RAMP:

3.00

SSRM:

3.27

PB Ratio

RAMP:

2.47

SSRM:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

RAMP:

$812.94M

SSRM:

$1.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RAMP:

$574.82M

SSRM:

$643.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

RAMP:

$97.51M

SSRM:

$835.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAMP vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAMP
RAMP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RAMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RAMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAMP vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAMPSSRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

4.18

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

10.21

-9.39

RAMP vs. SSRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the SSRM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAMP and SSRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAMP vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAMP drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAMP and SSRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAMPSSRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.83%

-91.68%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.13%

-31.28%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.19%

-73.41%

+25.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.71%

-83.16%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.93%

-34.34%

-21.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.38%

-57.09%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.24%

12.80%

+3.44%

Volatility

RAMP vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) is 1.60%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 19.50%. This indicates that RAMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAMPSSRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

19.50%

-17.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.91%

55.96%

-22.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.68%

67.57%

-22.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.53%

56.32%

-9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.04%

53.08%

-5.04%

Dividends

RAMP vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither RAMP nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

RAMP vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
206.09M
581.78M
(RAMP) Total Revenue
(SSRM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RAMP vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. and SSR Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
70.6%
0
Portfolio components
RAMP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 145.54M and revenue of 206.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.

SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RAMP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.29M and revenue of 206.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

RAMP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 19.26M and revenue of 206.09M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RAMP and SSRM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to RAMP (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAMP dropped -81.83% vs SSRM's -91.68%.

SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAMP and SSRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer