RALIX vs. GLFOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RALIX (Lazard Real Assets Portfolio) and GLFOX (Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares) are both mutual funds - RALIX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Lazard, while GLFOX is a Global Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 5 years, RALIX returned 7.10%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for GLFOX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RALIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for GLFOX.

Performance

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RALIX achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLFOX's 7.26% return.

RALIX

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -1.99%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 13.20%
• 1Y: 21.91%
• 3Y*: 13.38%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: —

GLFOX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 6M: 7.41%
• 1Y: 15.22%
• 3Y*: 13.64%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RALIX Lazard Real Assets Portfolio	12.25%	15.60%	5.91%	4.43%	-8.99%	22.32%	0.61%	16.07%	-7.59%	8.60%
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	7.26%	23.53%	6.43%	10.59%	-1.59%	19.67%	-4.71%	21.95%	-4.06%	19.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RALIX and GLFOX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.69

The correlation between RALIX and GLFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RALIX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RALIX

RALIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
RALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
RALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

GLFOX

GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 23
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RALIX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	1.43	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	1.94	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.27	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	1.70	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.71	5.74	+9.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RALIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the GLFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RALIX and GLFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RALIX	GLFOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	1.43	+1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	1.01	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.82	-0.20

Drawdowns

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RALIX drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum GLFOX drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RALIX and GLFOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RALIX	GLFOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-29.65%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.46%	-9.01%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.72%	-10.07%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.03%	-17.14%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-5.85%	+3.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-3.42%	-2.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	2.67%	-1.29%

Volatility

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) is 2.92%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that RALIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RALIX	GLFOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	4.51%	-1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.76%	9.32%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.61%	10.74%	-2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	11.00%	+0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	13.34%	-2.17%

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RALIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

RALIX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison

RALIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than GLFOX's 6.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares	6.10%	6.03%	4.00%	2.69%	14.50%	6.02%	2.39%	4.20%	13.99%	6.82%	2.07%	11.01%
RALIX Lazard Real Assets Portfolio	7.86%	7.04%	3.07%	2.93%	7.65%	11.84%	3.93%	2.24%	5.27%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RALIX and GLFOX in my portfolio?

RALIX and GLFOX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RALIX or GLFOX?

GLFOX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to RALIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RALIX dropped -24.00% vs GLFOX's -29.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.