PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAGHX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAGHX achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly lower than ANNPX's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RAGHX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 5.97%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.


RAGHX

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
-10.65%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
-0.45%
10Y*
5.97%

ANNPX

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.12%
YTD
21.03%
6M
20.04%
1Y
43.88%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
14.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RAGHX
Virtus Health Sciences Fund
-10.65%7.23%-2.33%2.57%-11.64%25.44%13.76%26.69%4.37%17.33%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
21.03%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RAGHX and ANNPX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between RAGHX and ANNPX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAGHX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAGHX
RAGHX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
RAGHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAGHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAGHX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
RAGHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAGHX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAGHXANNPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.55

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

6.26

-6.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

27.68

-27.41

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAGHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAGHX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAGHXANNPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

3.20

-3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.71

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

1.07

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.55

-0.08

Drawdowns

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAGHX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAGHX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAGHXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-55.61%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.94%

-7.15%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-13.67%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.14%

-26.85%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

-27.36%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-0.72%

-14.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-17.45%

+10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

1.61%

+4.96%

Volatility

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) have volatilities of 4.70% and 4.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAGHXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

4.69%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.24%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

13.99%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

12.83%

+3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

13.59%

+3.90%

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAGHX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAGHX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

RAGHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ANNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.30%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
RAGHX
Virtus Health Sciences Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.51%21.85%14.50%6.89%16.12%0.00%0.00%23.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAGHX and ANNPX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RAGHX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to ANNPX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAGHX dropped -40.23% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAGHX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer