RAGHX vs. GGHCX
RAGHX (Virtus Health Sciences Fund) and GGHCX (Invesco Health Care Fund) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RAGHX returned 6.69%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for GGHCX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RAGHX charges 1.37%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for GGHCX.
Performance
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAGHX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than GGHCX's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RAGHX has underperformed GGHCX with an annualized return of 6.69%, while GGHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.06% annualized return.
RAGHX
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 1.69%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.64%
GGHCX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAGHX Virtus Health Sciences Fund | -0.47% | 7.23% | -2.33% | 2.57% | -11.64% | 25.44% | 13.76% | 26.69% | 4.37% | 17.33% |
GGHCX Invesco Health Care Fund | 3.51% | 15.48% | 3.96% | 3.05% | -13.53% | 12.05% | 14.52% | 32.01% | 0.27% | 15.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAGHX and GGHCX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003 | 0.92 |
The correlation between RAGHX and GGHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAGHX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank
RAGHX
GGHCX
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAGHX | GGHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.31 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 2.86 | -1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAGHX drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, roughly equal to the maximum GGHCX drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAGHX and GGHCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAGHX | GGHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.23% | -40.23% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.94% | -13.53% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -16.86% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.14% | -25.37% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.01% | -29.34% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -2.93% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -8.80% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.08% | 6.15% | +0.93% |
Volatility
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Health Sciences Fund (RAGHX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) at 5.14%. This indicates that RAGHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAGHX | GGHCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.14% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 11.43% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 14.28% | +3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 15.71% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.44% | +0.14% |
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAGHX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAGHX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison
RAGHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGHCX Invesco Health Care Fund | 5.49% | 5.69% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.69% | 6.44% | 3.51% | 8.81% | 6.88% | 2.24% | 15.07% |
RAGHX Virtus Health Sciences Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.51% | 21.85% | 14.50% | 6.89% | 16.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAGHX and GGHCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RAGHX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to GGHCX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAGHX dropped -40.23% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.
GGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAGHX and GGHCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer