RAFE vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RAFE (PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the RAFI ESG US Index, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. RAFE is passively managed, while MINT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAFE returned 10.92%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for MINT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAFE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

RAFE vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 1.81% return.

RAFE

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 6.78%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 15.30%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.92%
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF	13.86%	17.60%	13.81%	18.80%	-13.76%	30.16%	5.29%	0.55%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.81%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-1.01%	-0.03%	1.62%	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and MINT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019	0.10

Return for Risk

RAFE vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE

RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 85
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RAFE	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	17.19	-14.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	65.90	-61.84
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	20.64	-19.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	94.87	-90.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.30	946.75	-929.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RAFE vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RAFE	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	17.19	-14.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	6.00	-5.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	2.47	-1.81

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAFE	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.74%	-4.62%	-31.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	-0.05%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.36%	-0.16%	-16.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.28%	-2.42%	-21.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-0.17%	-6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.00%	+1.91%

Volatility

RAFE vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that RAFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAFE	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	0.09%	+2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	0.20%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.33%	0.27%	+11.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	0.58%	+14.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	0.95%	+18.49%

RAFE vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAFE vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than MINT's 4.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.29%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF	1.49%	1.67%	1.79%	1.81%	2.22%	1.42%	2.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAFE and MINT in my portfolio?

RAFE and MINT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RAFE or MINT?

RAFE has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, RAFE or MINT?

On 5-year performance, RAFE leads with 10.92% vs 3.47% for MINT. On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RAFE or MINT?

Over the 5-year period, RAFE has performed better with a 10.92% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAFE or MINT?

RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAFE or MINT?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.49% for RAFE.

What is the main difference between RAFE and MINT?

RAFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.19 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.