PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAFE vs. DJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAFE vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.78% return.


RAFE

1D
-0.44%
1M
7.15%
YTD
13.35%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*

DJUN

1D
0.01%
1M
0.88%
YTD
3.78%
6M
4.53%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
13.35%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%22.25%
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
3.78%9.38%13.92%17.58%-6.30%6.27%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and DJUN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.83

The correlation between RAFE and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAFE vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DJUN
DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAFEDJUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.78

2.22

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

3.35

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.51

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.49

20.66

-4.17

RAFE vs. DJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the DJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and DJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAFEDJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.22

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.97

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

1.04

-0.40

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and DJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAFEDJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-11.96%

-23.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-3.15%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-11.96%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-11.96%

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-1.59%

-4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

0.53%

+1.38%

Volatility

RAFE vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.25%. This indicates that RAFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAFEDJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

0.25%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

3.55%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

5.04%

+6.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

8.52%

+6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

8.06%

+11.37%

RAFE vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAFE vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.50%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAFE and DJUN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RAFE has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to DJUN (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs DJUN's -11.96%.

On 5-year performance, RAFE leads with 10.73% vs 8.19% for DJUN. On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RAFE has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.

RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index, while DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.85% for DJUN.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAFE and DJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer