RACK vs. XLK
RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RACK tracks the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
RACK vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RACK
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- -11.86%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- 6M
- 22.34%
- YTD
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 37.95%
- 3Y*
- 26.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.65%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
RACK vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | -13.62% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | -9.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACK and XLK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACK vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
RACK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLK
RACK vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACK | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACK vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -16.65%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACK | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -82.05% | +65.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.65% | -10.33% | -6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -34.84% | +27.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.34% | — |
Volatility
RACK vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACK | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.40% | 24.54% | +26.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 25.58% | +25.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 24.80% | +26.60% |
RACK vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RACK vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, RACK and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RACK.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.
RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for RACK and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer