RACK vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RACK tracks the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index while TRFK tracks the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

RACK vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RACK

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 8.33%
• YTD: 59.85%
• 6M: 57.97%
• 1Y: 78.85%
• 3Y*: 50.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RACK vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	-2.60%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	-4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RACK and TRFK is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026	0.98

Return for Risk

RACK vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RACK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 76
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RACK vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RACK	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.05	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.50	—

Drawdowns

RACK vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -12.62%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RACK	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.62%	-29.06%	+16.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.03%	-7.89%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-6.04%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RACK	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.99%	32.02%	+24.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.99%	29.83%	+27.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.99%	29.83%	+27.16%

RACK vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

RACK vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RACK and TRFK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, RACK and TRFK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, RACK or TRFK?

On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RACK or TRFK?

RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RACK or TRFK?

TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.

What is the main difference between RACK and TRFK?

RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.60% for TRFK.