RACK vs. TRFK
RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RACK tracks the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index while TRFK tracks the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.
Performance
RACK vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RACK
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TRFK
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- 6M
- 39.68%
- YTD
- 42.16%
- 1Y
- 50.62%
- 3Y*
- 42.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 37.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13M | $2.03M | $2.83M | |
| $17.22M | $18.25M | $19.56M |
RACK vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | -10.35% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | -14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACK and TRFK is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACK vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank
RACK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRFK
RACK vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACK | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACK vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and TRFK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACK | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -29.06% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.50% | -18.08% | +4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -6.25% | -3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.70% | — |
Volatility
RACK vs. TRFK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACK | TRFK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.87% | 36.82% | +15.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 30.90% | +20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 30.90% | +20.97% |
RACK vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RACK vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison
RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, RACK and TRFK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.
TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.
RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.60% for TRFK.
Find the right allocation for RACK and TRFK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer