RACK vs. KROP
RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RACK tracks the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
RACK vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RACK
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
KROP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 0.14%
- 5Y*
- -11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.18K | $49.05K | $92.40K | |
| $1.13M | $2.03M | $2.83M |
RACK vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | -10.35% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACK and KROP is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACK vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
RACK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KROP
RACK vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACK vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -21.97%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -62.08% | +40.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.50% | -49.50% | +36.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -44.81% | +35.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
RACK vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACK | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.87% | 16.50% | +35.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 22.13% | +29.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.87% | 22.11% | +29.76% |
RACK vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RACK and KROP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
RACK vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.13% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RACK and KROP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RACK and KROP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.
RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X.
Find the right allocation for RACK and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer