RACE vs. MLPX
RACE (Ferrari N.V.) is a stock, while MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Over the past 10 years, RACE returned 25.85%/yr vs 13.35%/yr for MLPX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RACE vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RACE achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 26.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RACE has outperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 25.85%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.35% annualized return.
RACE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -4.24%
- 1Y
- -24.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 25.85%
MLPX
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 26.34%
- 6M
- 26.59%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 29.17%
- 5Y*
- 21.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.35%
RACE vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RACE Ferrari N.V. | -2.48% | -11.65% | 26.34% | 59.12% | -16.68% | 13.32% | 39.71% | 67.87% | -4.47% | 81.95% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26.34% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACE and MLPX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015 | 0.27 |
The correlation between RACE and MLPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACE vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
RACE
MLPX
RACE vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferrari N.V. (RACE) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACE | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.31 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.44 | -4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 8.20 | -9.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACE vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACE drawdown since its inception was -46.67%, smaller than the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACE and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACE | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.67% | -70.67% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.22% | -8.18% | -31.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.22% | -16.77% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.22% | -19.72% | -19.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | -64.70% | +25.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.38% | -3.58% | -26.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -16.57% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.57% | 3.42% | +22.15% |
Volatility
RACE vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
Ferrari N.V. (RACE) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) at 5.88%. This indicates that RACE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACE | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 5.88% | +6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.33% | 12.02% | +13.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.84% | 15.53% | +20.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.69% | 20.03% | +9.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.50% | 26.47% | +3.03% |
Dividends
RACE vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
RACE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than MLPX's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.06% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
RACE Ferrari N.V. | 2.42% | 1.85% | 0.61% | 0.59% | 0.69% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.61% | 0.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RACE and MLPX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RACE has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to MLPX (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RACE dropped -46.67% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RACE and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer