RAAX vs. SMH
RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. RAAX is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAAX returned 13.54%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for SMH. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
RAAX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
RAAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 19.15%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
RAAX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 19.15% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 6.14% | -2.41% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAX and SMH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between RAAX and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RAAX vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RAAX
SMH
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
RAAX
SMH
-
Industrials
RAAX
SMH
-
Basic Materials
RAAX
SMH
-
Utilities
RAAX
SMH
-
Real Estate
RAAX
SMH
-
Technology
RAAX
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
RAAX
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
RAAX
SMH
-
Healthcare
RAAX
SMH
-
Communication Services
RAAX
SMH
-
Financial Services
RAAX
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAAX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
RAAX
SMH
RAAX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAAX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.72 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 10.59 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.06 | 40.63 | -19.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAAX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 5.19 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 1.13 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.34 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
RAAX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -84.96% | +51.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -14.93% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -35.74% | +24.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -45.30% | +21.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | 0.00% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -41.09% | +34.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 3.89% | -2.12% |
Volatility
RAAX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) is 2.95%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that RAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAAX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 11.47% | -8.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 24.29% | -12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 30.56% | -16.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 35.01% | -19.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 32.57% | -16.81% |
RAAX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAAX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.96% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAAX and SMH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to RAAX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 39.21% vs 13.54% for RAAX. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 39.21% return vs 13.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.
RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
RAAX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SMH is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAAX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer