RAAX vs. DBMF
RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAAX returned 13.54%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
RAAX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 12.42% return.
RAAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 19.15%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
RAAX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 19.15% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 7.29% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.42% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAX and DBMF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, RAAX and DBMF have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
RAAX vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RAAX
DBMF
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
RAAX
DBMF
Industrials
RAAX
DBMF
Basic Materials
RAAX
DBMF
Utilities
RAAX
DBMF
Real Estate
RAAX
DBMF
Technology
RAAX
DBMF
Consumer Cyclical
RAAX
DBMF
Consumer Defensive
RAAX
DBMF
Healthcare
RAAX
DBMF
Communication Services
RAAX
DBMF
Financial Services
RAAX
DBMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAAX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
RAAX
DBMF
RAAX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAAX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.55 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 5.17 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.06 | 19.07 | +2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAAX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 2.59 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.68 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.77 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RAAX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -20.39% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -6.10% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -15.60% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -20.39% | -3.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | 0.00% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -6.59% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility
RAAX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.12%. This indicates that RAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAAX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.12% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 9.76% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 12.17% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 12.52% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 12.41% | +3.35% |
RAAX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAAX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than DBMF's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.09% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% |
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.96% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAAX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RAAX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to DBMF (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.54% vs 8.46% for DBMF. On fees, RAAX is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RAAX is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 1.96% for RAAX.
RAAX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.85% for DBMF.
RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAAX and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer