PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAR vs. TMED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAR vs. TMED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF (RAAR) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RAAR

1D
0.06%
1M
0.76%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TMED

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.35%
6M
16.95%
YTD
16.91%
1Y
42.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
34.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.73K$139.03K$102.06K
$576.43K$346.09K$158.73K

RAAR vs. TMED - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RAAR and TMED is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAR vs. TMED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAAR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TMED
TMED Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMED Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMED Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAAR vs. TMED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF (RAAR) and T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAARTMEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

RAAR vs. TMED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAAR vs. TMED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAR drawdown since its inception was -0.65%, smaller than the maximum TMED drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAR and TMED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAARTMEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-11.11%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-2.41%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

Volatility

RAAR vs. TMED - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAARTMEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

18.35%

-16.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.84%

18.11%

-16.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

18.11%

-16.27%

RAAR vs. TMED - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TMED's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAAR vs. TMED - Dividend Comparison

RAAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RAAR and TMED have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RAAR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RAAR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TMED.

TMED has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for RAAR.

RAAR is categorized as Actively Managed, while TMED is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RAAR and 0.44% for TMED.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAR and TMED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer