RAAR vs. RCLO
RAAR (Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF) and RCLO (Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF) are both Actively Managed funds from Reckoner. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAAR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RCLO.
Performance
RAAR vs. RCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RAAR
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCLO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAAR vs. RCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RAAR Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF | 2.03% |
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAR and RCLO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAAR vs. RCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF (RAAR) and Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAAR vs. RCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAR drawdown since its inception was -0.65%, smaller than the maximum RCLO drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAR and RCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAR | RCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -3.70% | +3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.07% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.45% | +0.36% |
Volatility
RAAR vs. RCLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAAR | RCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 2.97% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 2.97% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 2.97% | -1.02% |
RAAR vs. RCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than RCLO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAAR vs. RCLO - Dividend Comparison
RAAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RAAR Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF | 4.74% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAAR and RCLO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RAAR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAAR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RCLO.
RCLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 0.00% for RAAR.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RAAR and 0.50% for RCLO.
Find the right allocation for RAAR and RCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer