PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAR vs. SMRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAR vs. SMRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF (RAAR) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RAAR

1D
0.01%
1M
0.67%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMRF

1D
-4.82%
1M
-15.57%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAR vs. SMRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RAAR and SMRF is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAR vs. SMRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF (RAAR) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAAR vs. SMRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAAR vs. SMRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAR drawdown since its inception was -0.65%, smaller than the maximum SMRF drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAR and SMRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAARSMRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-22.47%

+21.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-22.47%

+22.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-7.28%

+7.19%

Volatility

RAAR vs. SMRF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAARSMRFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

45.03%

-43.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.91%

45.03%

-43.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.91%

45.03%

-43.12%

RAAR vs. SMRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRF's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAAR vs. SMRF - Dividend Comparison

RAAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RAAR and SMRF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RAAR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RAAR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

SMRF has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for RAAR.

They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RAAR and 0.65% for SMRF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAR and SMRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer