RAAR vs. SAPH
RAAR (Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF) and SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAAR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SAPH.
Performance
RAAR vs. SAPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RAAR
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAPH
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -31.03%
- YTD
- -30.91%
- 1Y
- -45.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAAR vs. SAPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RAAR Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF | 2.03% |
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | -20.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAR and SAPH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAAR vs. SAPH — Risk / Return Rank
RAAR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAPH
RAAR vs. SAPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF (RAAR) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAAR | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.75 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAAR vs. SAPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAR drawdown since its inception was -0.65%, smaller than the maximum SAPH drawdown of -51.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAR and SAPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAR | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.65% | -51.14% | +50.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -48.20% | +48.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -22.21% | +22.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.92% | — |
Volatility
RAAR vs. SAPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAAR | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 34.95% | -33.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 34.14% | -32.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 34.14% | -32.19% |
RAAR vs. SAPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SAPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAAR vs. SAPH - Dividend Comparison
RAAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
RAAR Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA CLO Reinvesting ETF | 0.00% |
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | 4.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAAR and SAPH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RAAR.
SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 0.00% for RAAR.
They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RAAR and 0.19% for SAPH.
Find the right allocation for RAAR and SAPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer