PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAAA vs. PCMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAAA vs. PCMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAA achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than PCMM's 1.15% return.


RAAA

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCMM

1D
0.06%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.71%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAA vs. PCMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RAAA
Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF
2.18%2.46%
PCMM
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF
1.15%2.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAA and PCMM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAAA vs. PCMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAA

PCMM
PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAA vs. PCMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RAAA vs. PCMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAAAPCMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.76

1.08

+2.68

Drawdowns

RAAA vs. PCMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum PCMM drawdown of -4.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAA and PCMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAAAPCMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-4.32%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.41%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.43%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

Volatility

RAAA vs. PCMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAAAPCMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

3.94%

-2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.39%

4.97%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.39%

4.97%

-3.58%

RAAA vs. PCMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PCMM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAAA vs. PCMM - Dividend Comparison

RAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than PCMM's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025
PCMM
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF
6.62%7.02%
RAAA
Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF
4.79%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAAA and PCMM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RAAA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RAAA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for PCMM.

PCMM has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 4.79% for RAAA.

They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAAA and 0.68% for PCMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAAA and PCMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer