PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCMM vs. XTWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PCMM vs. XTWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PCMM vs. XTWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCMM achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than XTWY's 0.11% return.


PCMM

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-0.82%
6M
0.33%
1Y
2.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTWY

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
0.11%
6M
-1.83%
1Y
-3.05%
3Y*
-4.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PCMM vs. XTWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCMM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XTWY's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PCMM vs. XTWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCMM
PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

XTWY
XTWY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCMM vs. XTWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Bondbloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCMMXTWYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.53

-0.14

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

-0.10

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.99

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.07

+0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.67

-0.15

+4.81

PCMM vs. XTWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the XTWY Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCMM and XTWY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCMMXTWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

-0.14

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

-0.22

+1.10

Correlation

The correlation between PCMM and XTWY is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PCMM vs. XTWY - Dividend Comparison

PCMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than XTWY's 4.64% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
PCMM
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF
6.81%7.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTWY
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.23%4.56%4.65%3.86%1.08%

Drawdowns

PCMM vs. XTWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCMM drawdown since its inception was -4.32%, smaller than the maximum XTWY drawdown of -25.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCMM and XTWY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PCMMXTWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-25.92%

+21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.99%

-11.45%

+7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-14.85%

+12.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-12.08%

+11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

5.76%

-5.03%

Volatility

PCMM vs. XTWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) is 1.45%, while Bondbloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that PCMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PCMMXTWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

4.27%

-2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

7.82%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.49%

13.68%

-8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

17.93%

-12.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

17.93%

-12.83%