RAAA vs. CLOA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) and CLOA (iShares AAA CLO Active ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RAAA returned 5.48% vs 5.11% for CLOA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAAA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CLOA.

Performance

RAAA vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAA achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than CLOA's 2.46% return.

RAAA

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 2.43%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 1Y: 5.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLOA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 2.30%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 1Y: 5.11%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAA vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	2.90%	2.52%
CLOA iShares AAA CLO Active ETF	2.46%	2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAA and CLOA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.08

Return for Risk

RAAA vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAA

RAAA Risk / Return Rank: 98
RAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CLOA

CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 99
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAA vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAAA	CLOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.14	7.65	-3.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.98	14.44	-8.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.14	3.48	-1.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.76	29.05	-21.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	43.34	152.91	-109.57

RAAA vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAAA Sharpe Ratio is 4.14, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAAA and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RAAA vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum CLOA drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAA and CLOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAAA	CLOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-1.34%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.71%	-0.18%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.05%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.03%	+0.10%

Volatility

RAAA vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and iShares AAA CLO Active ETF (CLOA) have volatilities of 0.14% and 0.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAAA	CLOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	0.14%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.99%	0.48%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33%	0.67%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.33%	1.30%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.33%	1.30%	+0.03%

RAAA vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAAA vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

RAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than CLOA's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLOA iShares AAA CLO Active ETF	4.90%	5.35%	6.01%	5.88%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	5.21%	2.70%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAAA and CLOA in my portfolio?

RAAA and CLOA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RAAA or CLOA?

CLOA has higher volatility (0.14%) compared to RAAA (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAA dropped -0.71% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

Which ETF is better, RAAA or CLOA?

On 1-year performance, RAAA leads with 5.48% vs 5.11% for CLOA. On fees, CLOA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RAAA or CLOA?

Over the 1-year period, RAAA has performed better with a 5.48% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAAA or CLOA?

CLOA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAAA or CLOA?

RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.21%, compared with 4.90% for CLOA.

What is the main difference between RAAA and CLOA?

They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAAA and 0.20% for CLOA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.65 vs 4.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.