RAAA vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - RAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Reckoner, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. RAAA is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. RAAA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

RAAA vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAA achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

RAAA

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAA vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	2.18%	2.46%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAA and BNO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

RAAA vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAA vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RAAA	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.76	0.14	+3.62

Drawdowns

RAAA vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAA and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAAA	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-87.06%	+86.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-10.29%	+10.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-40.17%	+40.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RAAA	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39%	41.46%	-40.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.39%	35.38%	-33.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.39%	36.68%	-35.29%

RAAA vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAAA vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

RAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	4.79%	2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAAA and BNO in my portfolio?

RAAA and BNO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RAAA or BNO?

On fees, RAAA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAAA or BNO?

RAAA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAAA or BNO?

RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between RAAA and BNO?

RAAA is categorized as CLO, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAAA and 0.90% for BNO.