RAA vs. THRV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RAA charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.

Performance

RAA vs. THRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAA achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 2.15% return.

RAA

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 1Y: 17.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.06%

THRV

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 1.40%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	$1.45M	$1.38M	$1.58M
THRV Prospera Income ETF	$170.75K	$104.13K	$98.64K

RAA vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	7.87%	2.82%
THRV Prospera Income ETF	2.15%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between RAA and THRV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

RAA vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAA

RAA Risk / Return Rank: 69
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 68

THRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAA vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAA	THRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.78	—	—

Drawdowns

RAA vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAA drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAA and THRV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAA	THRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-1.50%	-10.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.25%	-0.26%	-2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-0.42%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RAA	THRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	2.88%	+7.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.62%	2.88%	+9.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.62%	2.88%	+9.74%

RAA vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAA vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison

RAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than THRV's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	2.13%	2.14%
THRV Prospera Income ETF	6.08%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAA and THRV in my portfolio?

RAA and THRV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RAA or THRV?

On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAA or THRV?

RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAA or THRV?

THRV has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 2.13% for RAA.

What is the main difference between RAA and THRV?

They also come from different issuers: SMI 3Fourteen and Prospera. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RAA and 1.80% for THRV.