RAA vs. MFUL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RAA (SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RAA returned 21.28% vs 6.78% for MFUL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RAA charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

RAA vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAA achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than MFUL's 2.96% return.

RAA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 8.82%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: 21.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFUL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: 2.87%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 4.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAA vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	8.82%	11.92%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	2.96%	3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RAA and MFUL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	0.89

The correlation between RAA and MFUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RAA vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAA

RAA Risk / Return Rank: 69
RAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RAA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RAA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 47
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAA vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAA	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.61	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.24	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.31	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	2.02	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.63	7.65	+5.98

RAA vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAA Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAA and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RAA vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAA drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum MFUL drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAA and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAA	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-16.41%	+4.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.91%	-3.36%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-0.77%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-9.40%	+7.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	0.89%	+0.67%

Volatility

RAA vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF (RAA) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.82%. This indicates that RAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAA	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	1.82%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	3.57%	+4.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.11%	4.23%	+5.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.86%	4.29%	+8.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.86%	4.29%	+8.57%

RAA vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAA vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

RAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than MFUL's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	3.02%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%
RAA SMI 3Fourteen REAL Asset Allocation ETF	2.11%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAA and MFUL in my portfolio?

RAA and MFUL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RAA or MFUL?

RAA has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to MFUL (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAA dropped -11.96% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, RAA or MFUL?

On 1-year performance, RAA leads with 21.28% vs 6.78% for MFUL. On fees, RAA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RAA or MFUL?

Over the 1-year period, RAA has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAA or MFUL?

RAA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAA or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.11% for RAA.

What is the main difference between RAA and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: SMI Advisory Services and Mohr Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RAA and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.