RA vs. DSU
RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) and DSU (BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - RA is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Brookfield, while DSU is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, RA returned 0.80%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for DSU. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RA charges 2.76%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for DSU.
Performance
RA vs. DSU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RA achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than DSU's 0.34% return.
RA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 9.08%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- —
DSU
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
RA vs. DSU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | 2.56% | 8.32% | 15.87% | -9.02% | -13.47% | 32.35% | -4.17% | 24.89% | -9.15% | 15.99% |
DSU BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. | 0.34% | 5.97% | 11.13% | 30.34% | -15.51% | 19.36% | 1.60% | 23.84% | -10.04% | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RA and DSU is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2016 | 0.39 |
The correlation between RA and DSU shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RA vs. DSU — Risk / Return Rank
RA
DSU
RA vs. DSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.10 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 0.58 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 2.15 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.51 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.59 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.23 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
RA vs. DSU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RA drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, smaller than the maximum DSU drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RA and DSU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.66% | -72.03% | +21.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.73% | -7.21% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.42% | -14.59% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -24.23% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.95% | -2.12% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -11.60% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.93% | +0.39% |
Volatility
RA vs. DSU - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) has a higher volatility of 2.26% compared to BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU) at 1.40%. This indicates that RA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 1.40% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 6.19% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.44% | 8.12% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 11.74% | +5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 15.91% | +4.74% |
RA vs. DSU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RA has a 2.76% expense ratio, which is higher than DSU's 2.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
RA vs. DSU - Dividend Comparison
RA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, less than DSU's 12.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSU BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. | 12.19% | 11.64% | 11.01% | 9.70% | 7.56% | 6.21% | 7.96% | 7.43% | 8.41% | 6.98% | 6.60% | 8.07% |
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | 11.15% | 10.93% | 10.63% | 16.74% | 14.79% | 11.31% | 13.39% | 11.19% | 12.52% | 10.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RA and DSU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RA has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to DSU (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RA dropped -50.66% vs DSU's -72.03%.
RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RA and DSU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer