RA vs. DSU
RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) and DSU (BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - RA is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by Brookfield, while DSU is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, RA returned 0.55%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for DSU. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RA charges 2.76%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for DSU.
Performance
RA vs. DSU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RA achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than DSU's -0.43% return.
RA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 8.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
DSU
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.16M | $3.62M | $3.24M | |
| $1.65M | $1.71M | $1.90M |
RA vs. DSU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | 5.54% | 8.32% | 15.87% | -9.02% | -13.47% | 32.35% | -4.17% | 24.89% | -9.15% | 15.99% |
DSU BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. | -0.43% | 5.97% | 11.13% | 30.34% | -15.51% | 19.36% | 1.60% | 23.84% | -10.04% | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RA and DSU is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2016 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RA vs. DSU — Risk / Return Rank
RA
DSU
RA vs. DSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 0.08 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 0.27 | +3.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RA vs. DSU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RA drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, smaller than the maximum DSU drawdown of -72.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RA and DSU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.66% | -72.03% | +21.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.73% | -7.21% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.42% | -14.59% | -13.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -24.23% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -2.88% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -11.55% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.11% | +0.39% |
Volatility
RA vs. DSU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is 1.79%, while BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that RA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RA | DSU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 2.03% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.92% | 6.46% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.32% | 8.33% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 11.73% | +5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 15.90% | +4.59% |
RA vs. DSU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RA has a 2.76% expense ratio, which is higher than DSU's 2.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
RA vs. DSU - Dividend Comparison
RA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than DSU's 12.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSU BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. | 12.54% | 11.64% | 11.01% | 9.70% | 7.56% | 6.21% | 7.96% | 7.43% | 8.41% | 6.98% | 6.60% | 8.07% |
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. | 11.04% | 10.93% | 10.63% | 16.74% | 14.79% | 11.31% | 13.39% | 11.19% | 12.52% | 10.22% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RA and DSU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSU has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to RA (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RA dropped -50.66% vs DSU's -72.03%.
RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RA and DSU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer