PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSU vs. FLRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DSU vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSU achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DSU has outperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 8.07%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.01% annualized return.


DSU

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
0.76%
6M
0.94%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
8.07%

FLRT

1D
0.17%
1M
1.11%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.75%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
8.95%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
5.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSU vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSU
BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc.
0.76%5.97%11.13%30.34%-15.51%19.36%1.60%23.84%-10.04%10.68%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
1.98%6.24%9.18%14.59%-2.72%3.18%2.78%9.44%-1.14%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DSU and FLRT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015

0.18

The correlation between DSU and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DSU vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSU
DSU Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSU Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRT
FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSU vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSUFLRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

4.03

-3.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

6.28

-5.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

2.00

-0.90

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

3.52

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.43

12.97

-10.55

DSU vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSU Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSU and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSUFLRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

4.03

-3.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

2.64

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.81

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.75

-0.52

Drawdowns

DSU vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSU drawdown since its inception was -72.03%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSU and FLRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DSUFLRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.03%

-20.96%

-51.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-1.78%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-2.87%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-7.60%

-16.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-20.96%

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

0.00%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-1.41%

-10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

0.48%

+1.45%

Volatility

DSU vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc. (DSU) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.35%. This indicates that DSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DSUFLRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

0.35%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.19%

1.18%

+5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

1.56%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.74%

2.30%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

6.17%

+9.75%

DSU vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSU has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DSU vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

DSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, more than FLRT's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DSU
BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund, Inc.
12.14%11.64%11.01%9.70%7.56%6.21%7.96%7.43%8.41%6.98%6.60%8.07%
FLRT
Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF
6.80%6.93%7.93%8.40%5.81%3.16%3.52%4.30%3.95%3.20%3.38%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DSU and FLRT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DSU has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to FLRT (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSU dropped -72.03% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DSU and FLRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer