RA vs. BRW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) and BRW (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RA returned 0.55%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for BRW. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RA charges 2.76%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for BRW.

Performance

RA vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RA achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than BRW's 3.37% return.

RA

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 3.70%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 1Y: 8.17%
• 3Y*: 1.52%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.01%

BRW

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 5.88%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 1Y: -8.31%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund	$1.29M	$1.36M	$1.43M
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	$1.65M	$1.71M	$1.90M

RA vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	5.54%	8.32%	15.87%	-9.02%	-13.47%	4.31%
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund	3.37%	5.89%	12.16%	18.49%	-4.64%	3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RA and BRW is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021	0.28

Return for Risk

RA vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RA

RA Risk / Return Rank: 25
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

BRW

BRW Risk / Return Rank: 1
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RA vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RA	BRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	-0.61	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	-0.72	+2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.90	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	-0.47	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	-0.78	+4.07

RA vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RA Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RA and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RA vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RA drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than BRW's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RA and BRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RA	BRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.66%	-17.74%	-32.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.73%	-17.74%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.42%	-17.74%	-10.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	-17.74%	-13.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-8.92%	+7.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-4.11%	-3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	10.62%	-8.12%

Volatility

RA vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) is 1.79%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that RA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RA	BRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.79%	3.91%	-2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.92%	8.85%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.32%	13.68%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.53%	13.02%	+4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.49%	12.89%	+7.60%

RA vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RA has a 2.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

RA vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

RA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than BRW's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BRW Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund	15.36%	14.46%	12.27%	16.02%	13.82%	4.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	11.04%	10.93%	10.63%	16.74%	14.79%	11.31%	13.39%	11.19%	12.52%	10.22%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RA and BRW in my portfolio?

RA and BRW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RA or BRW?

BRW has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to RA (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RA dropped -50.66% vs BRW's -17.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.