R1VL.L vs. UC96.L
R1VL.L (iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UC96.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - R1VL.L tracks the Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index while UC96.L tracks the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, R1VL.L returned 17.93%/yr vs 11.47%/yr for UC96.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. R1VL.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC96.L.
Performance
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R1VL.L is traded in USD, while UC96.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC96.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1VL.L achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly higher than UC96.L's 7.39% return.
R1VL.L
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 30.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UC96.L
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 17.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.42% | 16.01% | 13.45% | 6.43% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 7.39% | 12.76% | 7.88% | 9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1VL.L and UC96.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between R1VL.L and UC96.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L — Risk / Return Rank
R1VL.L
UC96.L
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1VL.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.26 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.26 | 2.01 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.65 | 7.44 | +12.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1VL.L drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, smaller than the maximum UC96.L drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1VL.L and UC96.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1VL.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.43% | -34.85% | +18.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -8.45% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -17.61% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.90% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -4.38% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 2.28% | -0.73% |
Volatility
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (R1VL.L) is 2.62%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC96.L) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that R1VL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC96.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1VL.L | UC96.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.95% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.94% | 8.25% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 11.27% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 15.20% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.61% | 16.37% | -3.76% |
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1VL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UC96.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
R1VL.L vs. UC96.L - Dividend Comparison
R1VL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC96.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1VL.L iShares Russell 1000 Value UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC96.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.15% | 1.21% | 0.69% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.62% | 1.84% | 1.39% | 1.86% | 1.58% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
R1VL.L and UC96.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1VL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1VL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC96.L.
R1VL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index, while UC96.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1VL.L and 0.25% for UC96.L.
Find the right allocation for R1VL.L and UC96.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer