R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - R1GR.AS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. R1GR.AS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.

Performance

R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

R1GR.AS

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 6.63%
• 1Y: 25.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND.AS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	6.45%	17.57%	24.73%
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between R1GR.AS and DFND.AS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024	0.19

Return for Risk

R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R1GR.AS

R1GR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 42
R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
R1GR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
R1GR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
R1GR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
R1GR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	R1GR.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	R1GR.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	R1GR.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.34%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	R1GR.AS	DFND.AS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.36%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.90%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	—	—

R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

R1GR.AS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

R1GR.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither R1GR.AS nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both R1GR.AS and DFND.AS in my portfolio?

R1GR.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, R1GR.AS or DFND.AS?

On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, R1GR.AS or DFND.AS?

R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFND.AS.

What is the main difference between R1GR.AS and DFND.AS?

R1GR.AS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1GR.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.